The Tragic Undoing of Escalante


     As many of you may know, President Trump arrived to the Capitol Building in Salt Lake City this morning to sign off on the new boundary changes that have been proposed for Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument. The proposal divides the area into 3 much smaller monuments, Escalante Canyons NM, Kaiparowits NM, and Grand Staircase NM, and also excludes more than a million acres of land around Wilderness Study Areas within Escalante that will be left unprotected or designated for coal mining. For those of you who aren’t familiar with the Escalante area of Southern Utah, these are just some of the more significant and popular regions and how they will be affected.

Paving Hole in the Rock Road:The entire Hole in the Rock Road proper would be excluded from the National Monuments. The reason this is being pushed is so that certain organizations can have the road paved and use it without being restricted by Federal Land laws, allowing them to take groups bigger than 12 persons (rumor is they would like to be taking tour groups of 100 people at once) to the historical pioneer site, Hole in the Rock, located at the far south end of the road. The historical site would most likely become a State Park. This would undoubtedly impact all of the other beautiful, pristine wilderness found along that road, regardless of whether it will still be within the NM boundaries or not, with the easier access of a paved highway. Foot traffic will increase which not only disturbs the wild experience and feeling for visitors in these remarkable and remote places, but will also be the cause to increased damage and erosion to the delicate sandstone they’re made of. We’ve already seen enough names carved into the walls of slot canyons this year.

Excluding Dry Fork Canyons: The four, exquisite slot canyons located in the Dry Fork of the Coyote Gulch will be excluded from the National Monument. These are Dry Fork Narrows, Peek-A-Boo Gulch, Spooky Gulch, and Brimstone Gulch. These spectacular and unique slot canyons will no longer be included in any National Monuments, which means they will no longer be preserved by the Antiquities Act that protected them before. They could then be privatized and closed off to the public and be used or sold for whatever means the owners feel like.

Mining in Wahweap: The Wahweap Hoodoos area is in a section that has been excluded from all 3 of the new National Monuments and is designated for coal mining. While the specific location of the hoodoos along the wash that is the main attraction here may be left intact, the mining surrounding this Wilderness Study Area will undoubtedly disrupt the fragile ecosystem and the feeling of having a wilderness experience here with factories obstructing the views and producing loud noise. The entire area will also most likely be fenced off and will not be accessible to the public. After the mining is done and all the coal has been removed, this scarred earth will never recover or return to how it is now.

Excluding Upper Buckskin Gulch and the Upper Paria River: Buckskin Gulch is the longest and deepest slot canyon in the Southwest, and arguably one of the most remarkable. The Paria River, just next to it, is another remote and unique place full of incredible sandstone formations, rainbow colors, and winding canyon walls. While only the upper sections of these canyons will be affected, since the rest belongs to the Paria-Vermillion Cliffs Wilderness Area, the access to them could eventually be closed off to the public and without Federal Laws protecting them they surrounding areas could be altered and damaged. With part of them unprotected, it will just make it more likely for the rest to be excluded as well later on down the road.

     While these are just 4 of the more well known areas, there are also millions of more acres that will be affected that include unique, technical slot canyons, colorful badlands, enormous sandstone arches, delicate hoodoos, and much more. To see a map of all the boundary changes as well as a more extensive list of the areas that will be affected, visit this link: Escalante Boundary Reductions Map

     It’s a shock to me that this is even an issue, as for anyone that has visited this area it would be a no brainer to keep it under federal protection and preserve it forever. I guess the problem is that the people supporting and making these decisions haven’t taken the time to visit any kind of wilderness to understand its irreplaceable and incomparable value to any kind of revenue project. After all, “mostly tumbleweeds” is how some local and federal officials that are backing these changes have described the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument.

Giselle Peekaboo

How Do You Feel About the Escalante Boundary Reductions?

  • Brian Kraft

    on January 25, 2019

    I took my teenagers on the southern Utah tour last summer (2018) and it was easily the best experience we've had together. We spent three nights in the town of Escalante. We all agreed that hiking Spooky and Peek-a-Boo gulches was the coolest thing we'd ever done. Reading about these changes makes me sad and ill.

  • JoAnn Curtin

    on December 9, 2017

    As a Native American, and native Utahan, I am very sad about what could happen to such beautiful land.

  • bennettfilm

    on December 6, 2017

    Just a little update on some of the GSENM Boundary Reductions that might clarify some of the confusion happening:

    The land that is being excluded from the NM is going back under the protection and management of the BLM. Now, there are plenty of awesome BLM areas that haven't been raped and are in pretty good shape, but only because they have nothing precious to extract. The whole reason they are returning a lot of this land to the BLM is because 1. Fewer restrictions on cattle grazing, meaning they can dig for springs and create new irrigation routes, plant more grassfields, chop stuff down, add fences, etc. 2. Under the BLM it opens back up a lot of ATV trails and roads that were closed off before under the NM restrictions in order to protect the fragile ecosystem. And 3. It opens back up some of the oil fields and coal mine deposits that can then be leased out and extracted.

    While the WSAs will still be protected from any mining, grazing, offroading, etc. the surrounding land around them won't be. I wouldn't care about this going back to the BLM if I knew it wasn't for some hidden agenda that would affect the land. I know these guys have plans to take advantage of the less strict, BLM laws these areas will fall under and that will potentially destroy many parts of it.

  • John Logan

    on December 5, 2017

    “Everywhere we looked, natural resource professionals agreed that industrial-strength recreation holds more potential to disrupt natural processes on a broad scale than just about anything else. It’s a very tough problem affecting all of us.”
    -Bill Hedden, Grand Canyon Trust

  • Aaron Couch

    on December 4, 2017

    “Wilderness is not a luxury but a necessity of the human spirit, and as vital to our lives as water and good bread. A civilization which destroys what little remains of the wild, the spare, the original, is cutting itself off from its origins and betraying the principle of civilization itself.”
    ― Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire

Powered by SmugMug Owner Log In